Get your own free workspace
View
 

Heidgerken et al 2005

Page history last edited by Chris Barthold 3 years, 3 months ago

Heidergerken, A.D., Geffken, F., Modi, A., & Frakey, L. (2005).  A survey of autism knowledge in a health care setting.  JADD, 35 (3), 323- 330.

  • Diagnostic criteria for autism have refined over the lears
  • identification, awareness and diagnosis has improved as well
  • more referrals than before
  • often peds and family practitioners are the first people to come in contact with
    • American Academy of Pediatrics - increased epidemiology, peds are more likely to encounter a child with autism
    • comorbidity - kids are more likely to see specialists
  • diagnosis is often difficult - latency to diagnosis is often long
    • can impede early intervention and long-term outcomes
    • impacts services and advocacy
  • some clinicians might have outdated knowledge and lack the most up-to-date education
  • may also have misconceptions and beliefs
    • Stone's instrument
    • Shah (2001) - medical students could identifiy the diagnostic criteria, but did not necessarily know causes, profiles, or treatments
  • parents and teachers often have misconceptions as well (Stone & Rosenbaum 1988)
    • this paper is awfully old!
    • Helps, Newson-Davis, and Callis (1999) replication
      • still misconceptions among mainstream and SPED teachers
      • much more training needed for teachers and parents
  • are health professionals more knowledgable about diagnosis than they used to be?
  • Current study - used DSM-IV criteria
    • compared those twho tend to work closely with kids with autism (e.g., psychiatrists) with front line providers, and CARD employees
  • Participatns
    • 8 in family practice
    • 20 in peds
    • 5 neuro
    • 9 SLP
    • 16 clinical psychologists
    • 35 CARD
      • 44 MD or PhD
      • 15 MS
  • Procedures
    • Autism Survey given to each
      • Part I - beliefs about autism
      • Part II - diagnostic criteria
  • Results
    • Part I - MANOVA by group with Tukey's post hoc analyses
    • Significant effects on these questions
      • special education needed
      • higher socioeconomic status
      • do not show social attachments
      • do not show affectionate behavior
      • more intelligent
      • difficult to distinguish between autism and schizophrenia
      • usually grow up to be schizophrenic 
      • cold rejecting parents
      • deliberatively negativistic and noncompliant
      • eventually outgrown 
        • more likely in specialists and primary care providers than CARD
      • less likely to state comfort in diagnosis than CARD
      • Developmental disorder - less likely to say
    • Part II
      • MANOVA by group
        • helpful but not necessary - CARD employees were likely to use inappropriate laughing and giggling and sensory responses for diagnosis
        • Primary care providers - thought patterns
          • less likely to ID unusual mannerism
          • specialists - lack of social responsiveness considered helpful but not necessary
  • Discussion
    • all three groups were accurate about the diagnostic criterion
    • primary care providers had some outdates beliefs about children with autism
    • less likely to endorse SPED - WAS THERE A TYPO?
      • less likely to advocate for services
    • more likely not to use responsiveness to sensory stimuli as a criterion
    • more differences the less likely a provider was to be a health care provider for a child with autism
    • primary providers still maintain that it is difficult to distinguish autism from childhood schizophrenia
      • prevalence rates of schizophrenia in childhood extremely low
      • sometimes more difficult in Asperger's syndrome
    • more specialists - refrigerator mother theory
    • also - outdated expectations about course and outcome
      • less likely to call it a developmental disorder
      • also thought kids could outgrow the disorder with the proper treatment
    • need for more training and awareness
      • sample may not have been representative
      • questions taken from DSM-III that are also still in the DSM-IV - could have been a confound
  • More research is needed

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.