Get your own free workspace
View
 

Helps 1999

Page history last edited by Chris Barthold 3 years, 3 months ago

Helps, S., Newsom-Davis, I.C., & Callias, M. (1999).  Autism: The teacher's view.  Autism, 3(3), 287-297. DOI on paper.

 

  • many different ways autism has been conceptualized
    • mental disorder
    • neuropsychological models including the frontal lobe
  • different beliefs among individuals lay and professional
  • Stone -questionnaire regarding autism beliefs
    • do teachers have a variance of beliefs and why?
  • Importance of teacher beliefs
    • work closely at a time when features of autism are most obvious
    • prominent role in the education and care of children with autism
    • early intervention is crucial
      • must have an accurate view of autism across disciplines in order to be effective practitioners
    • integration more common
      • could apply misleading interventions
      • must have specific knowledge and flexibility when working with children with autism
  • teacher training
    • often occurs during inservice trainings
    • most teachers don't get the training
  • research questions
    • how much training do teachers get in autism, and how much do they think they need?
    • empirical evidence regarding knowledge and beliefs
  • Measures
    • Stone belief questionnaire
    • added 9 items regarding education, experience and training needs
  • Participants - 8 schools in London - all had kids with autism in the school
    • 22 mainstream teachers
    • 63 special educators
    • 10 support staff
      • special educators tended to be older and teaching longer
      • control group - 10 mental health professionals considered to be autism experts
  • Procedures
    • each participant filled out an anonymous questionnaire
    • non-parametric tests (Kruskal-Wallis) done - small N and non normal distribution
    • Qualitiative analysis of questions - NOT A LOT OF QUOTES
  • Results
    • 70% mainstream teachers - worked with kids with ASD
      • 5% training in school
      • 5% training in inservice
    • 50% special educators received training
    • 40% support staff received training
    • comparison of beliefs and knowledge
      • teachers - less empathetic than mental health professionals
      • teachers - agreed that
        • can't outgrow
        • need structure and predictability
        • classroom organization can impact a child's behavior - THAN PSYCHOLOGISTS?
      • differences
        • autism - no learning difficulties
        • special abilities/talents
        • emotional disorder
    • training needs of staff
      • practical advice
      • behavior management
      • teaching methods
        • 37% - anything at all
        • 21%  - inclusion
        • 15% - work with trained professionals
        • 8% - visit a school
        • 6% - training packages like TEACCH
        • 5% - ongoing training and observation
  • Discussion
    • all groups - consistent with DSM-IV diagnostic criteria
      • doesn't address educational concepts
      • expert ratings were consistent with accepted practices
    • differences of opinion among the three teachers
      • salient diagnostic features
        • not having learning difficulties (I ASSUME THIS MEANS MR?)
        • describe as an emotional disability
        • less likely - developmental disorder
    • could cause teachers to overestimate children's cognition
      • frustration
      • unrealistic expectations
      • development of agg and other problem behavior
    • emotional disorder?
      • did they know what an emotional disorder was?
      • or was is a clear misinterpretation of the disorder?     
        • could affect educational and behavioral intervention
    • not a DD?
      • not familiar with the terminology?
        • expectations could be skewed
        • don't understand the causal processes
        • confused and outdated views
    • training lacking, especially for mainstream teachers
      • less likely to agree with accepted educational practices
      • training needs reported as very high
      • most teachers didn't know when training was available
      • would take any type of training
  • Conclusions
    • Stone Autism Questionnaire is a valid tool for assessing autism knowledge
    • technical terms might need to be defined for some populations
    • many teachers lack basic understanding of autism
    • lots of outdated beliefs
      • teachers were very aware of what they didn't know!
      • did know a lot about strategies for teaching
      • more inclusive environments = less knowledge
    • training suggestions
      • ongoing support and guidance
      • establish effective training
      • disseminate research in a digestable format
    • study limitations
      • small sample
      • wider area of sampling
      • not representative

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.