Helps, S., Newsom-Davis, I.C., & Callias, M. (1999). Autism: The teacher's view. Autism, 3(3), 287-297. DOI on paper.
- many different ways autism has been conceptualized
- mental disorder
- neuropsychological models including the frontal lobe
- different beliefs among individuals lay and professional
- Stone -questionnaire regarding autism beliefs
- do teachers have a variance of beliefs and why?
- Importance of teacher beliefs
- work closely at a time when features of autism are most obvious
- prominent role in the education and care of children with autism
- early intervention is crucial
- must have an accurate view of autism across disciplines in order to be effective practitioners
- integration more common
- could apply misleading interventions
- must have specific knowledge and flexibility when working with children with autism
- teacher training
- often occurs during inservice trainings
- most teachers don't get the training
- research questions
- how much training do teachers get in autism, and how much do they think they need?
- empirical evidence regarding knowledge and beliefs
- Measures
- Stone belief questionnaire
- added 9 items regarding education, experience and training needs
- Participants - 8 schools in London - all had kids with autism in the school
- 22 mainstream teachers
- 63 special educators
- 10 support staff
- special educators tended to be older and teaching longer
- control group - 10 mental health professionals considered to be autism experts
- Procedures
- each participant filled out an anonymous questionnaire
- non-parametric tests (Kruskal-Wallis) done - small N and non normal distribution
- Qualitiative analysis of questions - NOT A LOT OF QUOTES
- Results
- 70% mainstream teachers - worked with kids with ASD
- 5% training in school
- 5% training in inservice
- 50% special educators received training
- 40% support staff received training
- comparison of beliefs and knowledge
- teachers - less empathetic than mental health professionals
- teachers - agreed that
- can't outgrow
- need structure and predictability
- classroom organization can impact a child's behavior - THAN PSYCHOLOGISTS?
- differences
- autism - no learning difficulties
- special abilities/talents
- emotional disorder
- training needs of staff
- practical advice
- behavior management
- teaching methods
- 37% - anything at all
- 21% - inclusion
- 15% - work with trained professionals
- 8% - visit a school
- 6% - training packages like TEACCH
- 5% - ongoing training and observation
- Discussion
- all groups - consistent with DSM-IV diagnostic criteria
- doesn't address educational concepts
- expert ratings were consistent with accepted practices
- differences of opinion among the three teachers
- salient diagnostic features
- not having learning difficulties (I ASSUME THIS MEANS MR?)
- describe as an emotional disability
- less likely - developmental disorder
- could cause teachers to overestimate children's cognition
- frustration
- unrealistic expectations
- development of agg and other problem behavior
- emotional disorder?
- did they know what an emotional disorder was?
- or was is a clear misinterpretation of the disorder?
- could affect educational and behavioral intervention
- not a DD?
- not familiar with the terminology?
- expectations could be skewed
- don't understand the causal processes
- confused and outdated views
- training lacking, especially for mainstream teachers
- less likely to agree with accepted educational practices
- training needs reported as very high
- most teachers didn't know when training was available
- would take any type of training
- Conclusions
- Stone Autism Questionnaire is a valid tool for assessing autism knowledge
- technical terms might need to be defined for some populations
- many teachers lack basic understanding of autism
- lots of outdated beliefs
- teachers were very aware of what they didn't know!
- did know a lot about strategies for teaching
- more inclusive environments = less knowledge
- training suggestions
- ongoing support and guidance
- establish effective training
- disseminate research in a digestable format
- study limitations
- small sample
- wider area of sampling
- not representative
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.